September 21, 2017

Surviving Alice with an Appeal

Alice 101

This third article in the “Surviving Alice” series[1] examines how the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has responded to the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2014 Alice decision[2].  It also shows how applicants can use the PTAB’s recent decisions to substantially increase their chances of success before the board.  We look at appeals coming out of the USPTO’s business method work groups 3620, 3680 and 3690. Applicants have had a difficult time getting business method patents allowed since Alice.  The Alice decision firmly established the two part “Alice/Mayo test” as the standard for determining whether a patent’s claims were statutory under 35 U.S.C. 101.

Read on Bilski Blog

Related Articles

If You Want to Protect Your Business Method, Reframe It as a Technical Invention

Mark Nowotarski discusses how the most effective way to protect an inventive business method is with a patent on a technical invention. The most effective way to protect an inventive business...

Read more

Forging Ahead After Losing an Alice Appeal

Mark Nowotarski offers a cautious ray of hope for business method applications.It’s tough to fight on after losing an Alice appeal, but that’s just what most applicants are doing. An “Alice appeal”...

Read more

Business Method Patents Recover Under USPTO Guidance

Mark Nowotarski discusses how Business Method patents have recovered under the new 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance.

Read more

Nowotarski Patents uses an effective pragmatic approach to give you the best chance for success.

Book a free
15 min Consultation
Book a free
15 min Consultation
BOOK NOW