January 30, 2017

Surviving Alice in the Finance Arts

Alice 101

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank (“Alice”)[i] has had a dramatic impact on the allowability of computer implemented inventions, especially in the finance arts (e.g. insurance, banking, etc.).  This series of articles explores the dynamics of that impact in different computer implemented arts as a useful guide to help patent practitioners navigate the new realities of post-Alice prosecution. In Technology Center 3600, art units 3691-3696 within Work Group 3690 examine applications in finance, banking and insurance (“Finance Art Units”).  These art units have been the most heavily impacted by Alice.

Read on Bilski Blog

Related Articles

If You Want to Protect Your Business Method, Reframe It as a Technical Invention

Mark Nowotarski discusses how the most effective way to protect an inventive business method is with a patent on a technical invention. The most effective way to protect an inventive business...

Read more

Forging Ahead After Losing an Alice Appeal

Mark Nowotarski offers a cautious ray of hope for business method applications.It’s tough to fight on after losing an Alice appeal, but that’s just what most applicants are doing. An “Alice appeal”...

Read more

Business Method Patents Recover Under USPTO Guidance

Mark Nowotarski discusses how Business Method patents have recovered under the new 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance.

Read more

Nowotarski Patents uses an effective pragmatic approach to give you the best chance for success.

Book a free
15 min Consultation
Book a free
15 min Consultation
BOOK NOW